NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coshott v Barry & Anor [2012] NSWSC 850 Hearing dates: 3 June 2011 Decision date: 27 July 2012 Before: McCallum J Decision: Relief sought in orders 1, 2 and 5 of the further amended summons refused. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Limitation Act 1969 - application to claims for legal costs by solicitor against client where costs assessed under Legal Profession Act 1987 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Act 2004 Legal Profession Reform Act 1993 Limitation Act 1969 Supreme Court Act 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Coburn v Colledge [1897] 1 QB 702 Coshott v Lenin [2006] NSWDC 139 Coshott v Lenin [2007] NSWCA 153 Currabubula & Paola v State Bank of New South Wales [2000] NSWSC 232 Ryan v Hansen [2000] NSWSC 354; 48 NSWLR 184 Lenin v Coshott [2007] NSWSC 630 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth [2003] HCA 2; 211 CLR 476 Category: Separate question Parties: Ljiljana Coshott (plaintiff) Stephen Michael Barry (first defendant) Martin Pearce Board (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Bliim (plaintiff) G Turner (defendants) Solicitors:
CKB Partners (defendants) File Number(s): 2010/234928 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate