NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Big Kahuna Holdings Pty Ltd v Kitas (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 858 Hearing dates: 13 July 2012 Decision date: 31 July 2012 Before: McCallum J Decision: Defendant's application to have proceedings re-opened refused; defendant's application for relief against payment of interest during period of plaintiff's delay in proceedings refused; plaintiff ordered to pay 70% of the defendant's costs up to and including the first day of the hearing and 40% of the defendant's costs from that date Catchwords: COURTS - Practice and procedure - judgments and orders - power to re-open exercise of discretion before orders entered - circumstances in which power should be exercised by puisne judge
COSTS - follow the event - where loan agreement varied under Contracts Review Act - whether costs order should reflect proportion in which loan as varied funded by parties - decision in Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389 applied Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 District Court Act 1973 Property (Relationships) Act 1984 Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason [No 2] (1993) 176 CLR 300 Baker v Towle [2008] NSWCA 73 Bennett v Jones [1977] NSWLR 355 Big Kahuna Holdings Pty Ltd v Kitas [2012] NSWSC 615 Cook v Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 219 De L v Director General, NSW Department of Community Services [No 2] (1997) 190 CLR 207 Falkner v Bourke (1990) 19 NSWLR 574 Geoffrey W Hill & Associates v Squash Centre (Allawah North) Pty Ltd (unreported) NSWCA 2 October 1990 Harrison's Share under a Settlement [1955] Ch 260 Metro Meat Ltd v Werlick (1993) Aust Torts Reports 81-242 New South Wales Bar Association v Smith [1991] NSWCA 215 Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Khoshaba [2006] NSWCA 41 Perri v Flavell [No 2] NSWCA (unreported) 20 September 1995 Pittalis v Sherefettin [1986] 1 QB 868 Port Stephens Shire Council v Tellamist Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 353 Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389 Category: Costs Parties: Big Kahuna Holdings Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Joanna Kitas (defendant) Representation: Counsel: M R Gracie (plaintiff) B M Zipser (defendant) Solicitors: Whitfield Solicitors (plaintiff) Peter Mitchell Law Practice (defendant) File Number(s): 2007/264557 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate