NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gumbleton v Hewitt [2012] NSWSC 886 Hearing dates: 13 July 2012 Decision date: 13 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: 1. Partnership dissolved as and from 26 November 2010. 2. Under the circumstances, it is not appropriate to burden the partnership with costs for appointment of a receiver. Catchwords: PARTNERSHIP - rights and duties of partners inter se - where defendant removed money to which defendant was not entitled from partnership bank account -breach of partnership relationship or conduct justifying termination of the partnership
PARTNERSHIP - dissolution and winding up - by the court - where size of partnership is not substantial - where some partnership assets very likely could not be traced but in respect of which the plaintiff seeks no relief - where there is no appearance by the defendant - where neither party seeks appointment of receiver - not appropriate to appoint receiver Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Partnership Act 1892 Cases Cited: Cuming v Hennessey [2005] NSWSC 1219 Daniels v Smith [2006] NSWSC 1424 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Edward Gary Gumbleton (Plaintiff) John Patrick Hewitt (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Mackay (Plaintiff) No appearance by the defendant Solicitors: McCartney Young Lawyers (Plaintiff) No appearance by the defendant File Number(s): SC 2011/362591
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate