NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hanave Pty Ltd -v- Nahas Construction (NSW) Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 888 Hearing dates: 30 July 2012 Decision date: 30 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Technology and Construction List Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Payment of monies in Court to the first defendant was not in contravention of a requirement under Division 2A of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SECURITY OF PAYMENT ACT 1999 (NSW), DIVISION 2A - Plaintiff (principal contractor) sought to quash adjudication determination obtained by the first defendant (respondent) and paid monies into Court pending its challenge - thereafter the second defendant (claimant), a creditor of the first defendant, which had itself obtained an adjudication determination against the first defendant served on the plaintiff a payment holding request under s 26A of the Act - later the plaintiff's challenge failed and the monies in Court were paid out to the first defendant discharging the plaintiff's debt to the first defendant - the second defendant contended that the plaintiff had discharged its obligation as principal contractor to pay money under a contract to the first defendant as respondent in contravention of a requirement under Division 2A of the Act and was jointly and severally liable for the first defendant's debt to the second defendant - HELD - no contravention of the division because the payment out of Court was not discharge of the principal contractor's obligation as contemplated by s 26C(1) of the Act. Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Pilmer v HIH Casualty& General Insurance Limited (No 2) (2004) 90 SASR 465 Duncan v National Australia Bank Limited (2006) 95 SASR 208 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hanave Pty Ltd ACN 001 416 226 - Plaintiff Nahas Construction (NSW) Pty Limited ACN 124 452 786 - First Defendant Waco Kwikform Ltd ACN 002 835 396 - Second Defendant Deputy Commissioner of Taxation - Third Defendant BWE Electrical Pty Ltd ACN 108 762 607 - Fourth Defendant Pipeline Plumbing Developments Pty Ltd ACN 128 609 162 - Fifth Defendant Representation: Counsel: G.J. McVay - Plaintiff L.M. Pozniak - First Defendant M.A . Ashhurst SC - Second Defendant N.J. Williams SC with M.J. O'Meara - Third Defendant A. Giurtalis - Fourth Defendant F.G. Kalyk - Fifth Defendant Solicitors: Gilbert Mane Solicitors - Plaintiff Landerer & Company - First Defendant HWL. Ebsworth - Second Defendant Australian Government Solicitor - Third Defendant Salim Rutherford Lawyers - Fourth Defendant Knight Lawyers - Fifth Defendant File Number(s): 2012/179470
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate