NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pacific Resources International Pty Ltd v UTI (Australia) Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 893 Hearing dates: 31 July 2012 Decision date: 31 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Defendant's Notice of Motion of 30 July 2012 is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: EVIDENCE - expert reports - whether defendant should be permitted to rely on further evidence - whether it would cause irretrievable prejudice to plaintiffs Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Pacific Resources International Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Rothenberger Australia Pty (plaintiff) Namco Bandai Partners Australia Pty Ltd Ltd (formerly known as ATARI Australia Pty Ltd) (plaintiff) Audio Innovision Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited (plaintiff) Brackley Industries Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Onesteel Ltd (plaintiff) Conexus Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Sydney Automotive Paints and Equipment Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Ombou Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Direct Group Pty Ltd (formerly known as Innovations Holdings Pty Ltd) (plaintiff) GPC Electronics Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Henry Schein Regional Pty Limited (plaintiff) Hyosung Motors Australia Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Apollo Bicycle Co Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Killarney Linen Pty Ltd (plaintiff) UTI (Australia) Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate