NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the Law Society of NSW v Lo (No 2) [2012] NSWADT 159 Decision date: 08 August 2012 Jurisdiction: Legal Services Division Before: G. Mullane, Judicial Member M Riordan,Judicial Member C Bennett,Non-Judicial Member Decision: 1. The Respondent's Interlocutory Application filed on 14 May 2012 is refused and dismissed. 2. The name of the Respondent is to be removed from the roll of solicitors; and 3.The Respondent must pay the costs of the Law Society of and incidental to the proceedings as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: Solicitor - Discipline - Professional Misconduct - Grounds for Striking Off - Failure to comply with Sections 253, 254, 255, 256 and 260 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 - Mislead Investigator - False Declaration in Practising Certificate Application - Breach of Undertaking to fellow Practitioner - Attempt to Settle sale on notice Discharge of Mortgage forged - Unethical Conduct Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Rules 1998; Corporations Act (Cth) 2001 ss127-129 Cases Cited: R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63 Webb v R [1994] HCA 30 Commissioner of Corrective Services v Government and Related Employees' Tribunal & Ors [2004] NSW C A 291; Smith v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 Law Society V Dennis (1981) 7 Fam LR 417 Law Society of NSW v Hooper [2005] NSW ADT 174 Kylsilver Pty Ltd -v- One Australia Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 226 Miro -v- Fu Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 1009 Commonwealth Bank of Australia -v- Hilellis & Ors [2009] NSWDC 9 (13 February 2009) Prothonatory of the Supreme Court of NSW v P [2003]NSWCA 320 at 14 Law Society of NSW v Walsh [1997] NSWCA 185 per Beazley JA at p.40 point 3.4; Law Society of NSW v McKenzie [2003] NSWADT 92 Texts Cited: None Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Council of the Law Society of NSW (Applicant) Kevin Lo (Respondent) Representation: Counsel RF Sutherland SC (Applicant) M Castle (Respondent) L W Pierotti (Applicant) Verekers Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 102022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate