NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Smith's Snackfood Company Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (NSW) [2012] NSWSC 1116 Hearing dates: 13 September 2012 Decision date: 13 September 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Revenue List Before: Gzell J Decision: Orders rejected. Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES - Procedure - form of orders - whether time in the Taxation Administration Act 1996, s 102(1) should be varied - whether order should be made to avoid the embargo against objections in s 86(2)(b) Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Cases Cited: Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Harrington Park Children Services (NSW) Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWSC 266; (2008) 71 ATR 143 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Limited (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1, (2010) 239 CLR 531 Re Kerry (No 2) - Costs [2012] NSWCA 194 The Smith's Snackfood Company Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (NSW) [2012] NSWSC 998 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Smith's Snackfood Company Ltd (Plaintiff) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (NSW) (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Russell QC/ D Price (Plaintiff) C Leggat SC/ I Young (Defendant) Solicitors: Johnson Winter & Slattery (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitors (Defendant) File Number(s): SC 2010/307535 Publication restriction: N/A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate