NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lowe v Pascoe (No 3) [2012] NSWSC 907 Hearing dates: 8 August 2012 Decision date: 08 August 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Gzell J Decision: Application dismissed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Courts and judges generally - application that judge recuse himself - whether statement in judgment gave rise to reasonable apprehension of bias - whether fair-minded observer would so conclude Cases Cited: Lowe v Pascoe (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 885 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 970 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR 488 Australian National Industries Ltd v Spedley Securities Ltd (in liq) (1992) 26 NSWLR 411 Kwan v Kang [2003] NSWCA 336 British American Tobacco Australia Services v Laurie [2009] NSWCA 414 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie [2011] HCA 2; (2011) 242 CLR 283 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Geoffrey Alan Lowe (First Plaintiff) Mary Lowe (Second Plaintiff) Scott Pascoe (First Defendant) Margaret Sze Tu (Second Defendant) Helen Sze Tu (Third Defendant) Janet McNamara (Fourth Defendant) Shiu Shing (Sunly) Sze Tu (Fifth Defendant) Shie How (Gordon) Sze Tu (Sixth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C R C Newlinds SC with C H Withers (Plaintiffs) J Stoljar SC (First defendant) D Williams SC with J D Little (Fifth and sixth defendants) Solicitors: Holding Redlich (Plaintiffs) Argyle Lawyers (First defendant) CLS Legal (Fifth and sixth defendants) File Number(s): SC 2005/262284
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate