NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Reilly; R v Smith [2012] NSWCCA 166 Hearing dates: 28 June 2012 Decision date: 13 August 2012 Before: Basten JA Price J S. G Campbell J Decision: Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - sentencing - co-offenders in a 'ram raid' - whether sentencing judge failed to apply a discount for utilitarian value of pleas of guilty - whether Smith's sentence was manifestly excessive - whether sentencing judge failed to give Smith credit for pre-sentence custody - whether sentencing judge erred in the manner in which he took Form 1 matters into account - parity - whether sentencing judge failed to take into account Reilly's lack of significant previous convictions - whether Reilly had a justifiable sense of grievance - re-sentence. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 s 112(2), s 113(2), s 154F, s154G, s 195(1)(b) Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Devine v R [2009] NSWCCA 261 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Forbes v R [2009] NSWCCA 292 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; (2009) 195 A Crim R 1 R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; (1981) 147 CLR 383 R v English [2000] NSWCCA 245 R v Ilbay [2000] NSWCCA 251; R v Kollas and Mitchell [2002] NSWCCA 491 R v Lawrence [2005] NSWCCA 91 R v McHugh (1985) 1 NSWLR 588 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Timmis [2003] NSWCCA 158 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Beau Alexander Smith Steven John Reilly Crown Representation: Mr I Nash (applicant Reilly) Mr W Hunt (applicant Smith) Ms M Cinque (respondent) File Number(s): 2010/279129 2010/254838 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-07-28 00:00:00 Before: Black DCJ File Number(s): 2010/279129 2010/254838
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate