NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Steiner & Anor v Strang & Anor; Estate of Steiner Steiner v Strang & Anor Webster v Strang & Anor [2012] NSWSC 919 Hearing dates: 16 July 2012 Decision date: 14 August 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Probate List Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [31] of reasons. Catchwords: WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION - administrators and executors - application for appointment as administrator of part of deceased's estate - appointment sought as administrators with authority to commence and maintain legal proceedings in the USA for the benefit of the estate - whether grant of administration confers power on executor or administrator to deal with foreign assets - grant of administration is local - jurisdiction to appoint receivers to foreign asset - held not in interests of estate for proposed litigation in USA to be instituted - Court needs to be satisfied that persons appointed are fit and proper for the task - held appointment of receivers not in interests of estate
WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION - orders sought for interim distribution out of estate - whether there are sufficient funds in the estate with which to pay all pecuniary legacies - Court satisfied that distributions could safely be made - interim family provision orders pursuant to s 92A of the Succession Act not made - orders made pursuant to s 84 of the Probate and Administration Act or r 54.3(3)(d) or r 54.3(4)(b) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Legislation Cited: Probate and Administration Act 1898 Succession Act 2006 Cases Cited: Blackwood v R (1882-83) 8 App Cas 82 Cole v Muddle (1852) 10 Hare 186; 68 ER 892 Attorney-General v Schonfeld [1980] 1 WLR 1182; 3 All ER 1 Yunghanns v Candoora No. 19 Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2000] VSC 300; (2000) 35 ACSR 34 Ballabil Holdings Pty Ltd v Hospital Products Limited (1985) 1 NSWLR 155 Re Maudslay, Sons & Field [1900] 1 Ch 602 Tracy v Mandalay Pty Ltd [1953] HCA 9; (1953) 88 CLR 215 Daly v Sydney Stock Exchange Ltd [1986] HCA 25; (1986) 160 CLR 371 Romano v Romano [2004] NSWSC 775 Indyk v Wiernik [2006] NSWSC 868 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of Australia, Vol 23 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Steiner (Plaintiff 2012/215729 and 2012/185566) Robyn Gai Webster (2nd Plaintiff 2012/215729 & Plaintiff 2012/129833) Kenneth Ross Strang (1st Defendant 2012/215729; 2012/185566; and 2012/129833) Jason Tang (2nd Defendant 2012/215729; 2012/185566; and 2012/129833) Representation: Counsel: R M Jefferis (Plaintiff 2012/215729 and 2012/185566) G R Graham (Plaintiff 2012/129833) L Ellison SC (Defendants) Solicitors: Gells Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Glass Goodwin (Defendants) File Number(s): 2012/215729; 2012/185566; 2012/129833
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate