NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: FLICK v R [2012] NSWCCA 170 Hearing dates: 29 November 2011 Decision date: 17 August 2012 Before: Simpson J at [1] Blanch J at [45] Rothman J at [46] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal allowed; (3) The sentence imposed on the applicant by Woods ADCJ on 17 December 2010 be quashed and in lieu thereof the applicant be sentenced as follows: (i) On the first count of aggravated break, enter and commit serious indictable offence committed on 9 or 10 June 2010, and taking account of the offences disclosed on the Form 1, the applicant be sentenced to a non-parole period of 2 years' imprisonment commencing 15 December 2010 and concluding 14 December 2012 with a remainder of term of a further 15 months concluding 14 March 2014; (ii) On the second count of aggravated break, enter and commit serious indictable offence committed on 10 June 2010, the applicant be sentenced to a non-parole period of 12 months commencing 15 March 2012 and concluding 14 March 2013, and a remainder of term of a further 2 years concluding 14 March 2015; (iii) The overall sentence imposed for the two offences charged is a total sentence of 4 years and 3 months' imprisonment, commencing 15 December 2010 and concluding 14 March 2015, including a non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months concluding 14 March 2013. The applicant is first eligible for parole commencing on 14 March 2013. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal - sentencing - accumulation and totality - sentence for two similar offences - sentence imposed while another sentence being served. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application Under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 85 ALJR 1154 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Craig Flick (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: K. Averre (for the applicant) V. Lydiard (for the respondent) Legal Aid NSW (for the applicant) Solicitor for Public prosecutions (for the respondent) File Number(s): 2010/146007 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-12-17 00:00:00 Before: Woods ADCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate