Coshott v Barry & Anor (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 944

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Coshott v Barry & Anor (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 944 Hearing dates: 16 August 2012 Decision date: 17 August 2012 Before: McCallum J Decision: Plaintiff's application for leave to re-open case refused Catchwords: COURTS - practice and procedure - judgments and orders - power to re-open case after reasons given but before orders entered - where parties failed to draw Court's attention to relevant authority - no operative misapprehension of the law Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Act 2004 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Autodesk v Dyason [No 2] (1993) 176 CLR 300 Celemajer Holdings Pty Ltd v Kopas [2011] NSWSC 304 Coshott v Barry [2012] NSWSC 850 De L v Director General, New South Wales Department of Community Services [No 2] (1997) 190 CLR 207 Doyle v Hall Chadwick [2007] NSWCA 159 Frumar v The Owners of Strata Plan 36957 [2010] NSWCA 172 New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd v AE Grant & ors, Lloyds Syndicate No 991 [2009] NSWSC 950 Wentworth v Wentworth [1999] NSWSC 638 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Ljiljana Coshott (plaintiff) Stephen Michael Barry (first defendant) Martin Pearce Board (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: I Griscti (plaintiff) S Barry (defendants) Solicitors: Martin Place Lawyers (plaintiff) CKB Partners (defendants) File Number(s): 2010/234928 Publication restriction: None