NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Basil Notaras v Brinos Notaras [2012] NSWSC 947 Hearing dates: 19 July 2012 Decision date: 19 July 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: Judgment for the plaintiff. Catchwords: EQUITY - trusts and trustees - where s 17 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) requires each member of a self-managed superannuation fund to be a trustee or director of the corporate trustee - where a trustee has breached fiduciary duties owed to the trust and breached s 52(2) of the Act - appropriate to remove that trustee and permit replacement by a corporate trustee connected with the only beneficiary having an interest in the fund, subject to approval by the Australian Taxation Office
EQUITY - trusts and trustees - where trustee breached fiduciary duty owed to the trust - trustee to account for the amount of trust proceeds withdrawn in excess of his entitlement as beneficiary Legislation Cited: Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) Trustee Act 1925 Cases Cited: Crowle Foundation v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2010] NSWSC 647 Notaras v Notaras [2011] NSWSC 546 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Basil Theodore Notaras (Plaintiff) Brinos Theodore Notaras (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B DeBuse (Plaintiff) No appearance by the defendant Solicitors: McCooe Raves & Poole (Plaintiff) No appearance by the defendant File Number(s): SC 2011/112756
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate