NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Castagna v R [2012] NSWCCA 181 Hearing dates: 14 October 2011 Decision date: 23 August 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL Latham J Harrison J Decision: Appeal against conviction dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - supply of more than a large commercial quantity - deemed supply - whether trial judge erred in refusing to sever count 2 - whether trial judge erred in refusing to direct a verdict - whether trial judge erred in directions to the jury - whether unreasonable verdict Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297R v Serratore [1999] NSWCCA 377 R v Hamzy (1994) 74 A Crim R 341 M v R [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v R [2002] HCA 53; (2002) 213 CLR 606 SKA v R [2011] HCA 13; (2011) 243 CLR 400 R v Nguyen [2010] HCA 38; (2010) 85 ALJR 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alexander Robert Castanga - (Applicant) Regina - (Respondent) Representation: Counsel M Ramage QC - (Applicant) P Ingram SC - (Respondent) Solicitors Jeffreys Lawyers - (Applicant) S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - (Respondent) File Number(s): 2007/13252 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2009-09-10 00:00:00 Before: PR Zahra SC DCJ File Number(s): 2007/13252
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate