NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Raashed v Hussein [2012] NSWCA 264 Hearing dates: 17 August 2012 Decision date: 24 August 2012 Before: Macfarlan JA; Sackville AJA Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: APPEAL - application for leave to appeal - no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 Cases Cited: House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Khoshaba [2006] NSWCA 41; (2005) 14 BPR 26,639 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rashid Raashed (Applicant) Mosharrof Hussein (First Respondent) Mehjabin Hussein (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Levet (Applicant) V Thomas (Respondents) Solicitors: Valerie Gibson-Tilley (Applicant) Turner Freeman Lawyers (Respondents) File Number(s): CA 2012/231849; CA 2012/45220 Decision under appeal Citation: Rashid Raashed v Mosharrof Hussein [2011] NSWSC 1342 Date of Decision: 2011-11-13 00:00:00 Before: Associate Justice Harrison File Number(s): SC 2010/406425
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate