NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stewart v R [2012] NSWCCA 183 Hearing dates: 20 June 2012 Decision date: 29 August 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Price J at [2] Button J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - sexual intercourse without consent - no failure to identify and assess objective seriousness - no failure to identify and assess subjective features - whether intoxication relevant to sentence - sentence not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; (2010) 201 A Crim R 379 Doolan v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 29; (2006) 160 A Crim R 54 King v R [2010] NSWCCA 33 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 R v Coleman (1990) 47 A Crim R 306 R v Cunningham [2006] NSWCCA 176 R v Ehrlich [2012] NSWCCA 38 R v Koloamatangi [2011] NSWCCA 288 R v Muldrock; Muldrock v R [2012] NSWCCA 108 Williams v R [2012] NSWCCA 172 Yang v R [2012] NSWCCA 49 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Darryl Kingsley Stewart (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Burgess (applicant) T Smith (respondent) Solicitors: B Sandland (applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (respondent) File Number(s): 2010/386822 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2011-12-15 00:00:00 Before: Black DCJ File Number(s): 2010/386822
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate