NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Soames v R [2012] NSWCCA 188 Hearing dates: 18 July 2012 Decision date: 29 August 2012 Before: Allsop P at 1 Latham J at 4 Davies J at 112 Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - sexual intercourse without consent -whether unreasonable verdict - whether trial miscarried by denial of procedural fairness Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 M v R [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v R [2002] HCA 53; (2002) 213 CLR 606 R v Nguyen [2010] HCA 38; (2010) 85 ALJR 8 R v GAR (No 3) [2010] NSWCCA 165 R v Teasdale [2004] NSWCCA 91 ; 145 A Crim R 345 Livermore v R [2006] NSWCCA 334 ; 67 NSWLR 659 R v McCullough (1982) 6 A Crim R 274 KNP v R [2006] NSWCCA 213 R v Joseph Attallah [2005] NSWCCA 277 R v Liristis (2004) 146 A Crim R 547 R v Rugari (2001) 122 A Crim R 1 MWJ v The Queen [2005] HCA 74 ; 222 ALR 436 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 73 ALJR 306 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Natham Soames - (Applicant) Regina - (Crown Respondent) Representation: P Hamill SC - (Applicant) T Smith - (Crown Respondent) Nyman Gibson Stewart - (Applicant) S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - (Crown Respondent) File Number(s): 2008/75615 Decision under appeal Before: D Woodburne SC DCJ File Number(s): 2008/75615
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate