NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Spaliviero v R [2012] NSWCCA 189 Hearing dates: 16 December 2011 Decision date: 29 August 2012 Before: Simpson J at 1 Hislop J at 2 Latham J at 3 Decision: (i) Leave to appeal granted.
(ii) Appeal allowed.
(iii) Quash the sentence imposed by Blackmore SC DCJ on 3 December 2010.
(iv) In lieu, taking into account the offences on the Form 1, impose a non parole period of 11 years, to date from 26 October 2006, expiring 25 October 2017, with a balance of term of 4 years, expiring 25 October 2021.
(v) The applicant is eligible for release on 26 October 2017. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - knowingly take part in the manufacture of a large commercial quantity of ecstasy (MDMA) - discount applicable to sentence - whether the trial judge erred in the approach to the applicant's mental disorder - whether the trial judge erred in the approach to the applicant's assistance Cases Cited: R v Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48 R v Z [2006] NSWCCA 342 ; 167 A Crim R 436 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25 ; 215 ALR 213 R v Baxter [2007] NSWCCA 237 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v Sukkar (2006) 172 A Crim R 151 FS v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 301 R v Totten [2003] NSWCCA 207 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steven Wayne Spaliviero - (Applicant) Regina - (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Hamill SC - (Applicant) P Ingram SC - (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate