NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: De Costi Seafoods (Franchises) Pty Limited and Anor v Wachtenheim and Anor [2012] NSWDC 125 Hearing dates: 22/08/2012 Decision date: 22 August 2012 Before: P Taylor SC DCJ Decision: Refuse leave to admit the further evidence of Mr Birrell under r 31.28 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Application to adduce further evidence - expert Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2005] NSWSC 706 HM&O v Ingram [2012] NSWSC 684 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Serge Wachtenheim (first cross-claimant) Deist Safety Equipment Australia Pty Ltd (ACN: 081 763 877) (second cross-claimant) De Costi Seafoods (Franchises) Pty Limited (ACN: 103 324 812) (first cross-defendant) Frank Theodore (second cross-defendant) George Costi (fourth cross-defendant) De Costi Seafoods (Holdings) Pty Limited (ACN: 064 186 410) (fifth cross-defendant) Androulla Costi (seventh cross-defendant) Representation: Mr R Newell (cross-claimants) Mr S J Stanton with Mr M B Holmes (first, second, fourth, fifth and seventh cross-defendants) L C Muriniti & Associates (cross-claimants) McLachlan Thorpe Partners (first, second, fourth, fifth and seventh cross-defendants) File Number(s): 2006/296319 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate