NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v MASCALL, MASCALL and SEWELL [2012] NSWDC 176 Decision date: 11 May 2012 Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: Paul Mascall - for the offences of conspiracy to defraud the Commonwealth and conspiracy to cause a loss to the Commonwealth - 4 years imprisonment. To be released upon giving security in the sum of $500 by recognizance and without sureties after serving 2 years imprisonment. Lesley Mascall - for the offences of conspiracy to defraud the Commonwealth and conspiracy to cause a loss to the Commonwealth - 3 years imprisonment. To be released upon giving security in the sum of $500 by recognizance and without sureties, after serving 15 months imprisonment. Paul Sewell - for the offence of conspiracy to defraud the Commonwealth and obtain a financial benefit by deception - 2 years imprisonment, to be released forthwith upon giving security in the sum of $500 by recognizance and without sureties. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Particular offences - property offences - defrauding the Commonwealth - conspiracy - Vanuatu tax evasion scheme - reliance on advice of tax agent in entering the scheme - objectively serious offence - tax shortfall of over $166,000 (Lesley Mascall), over $174,000 (Paul Mascall), over $25,000 (Paul Sewell), over $450,000 (Air Solutions) and nearly $65,000 (Varitech) - offending behaviour part of course of conduct extending over long period. Sentence - purpose - general deterrence of great importance - personal deterrence - of little importance in this case - relevant factors - motivation - financial gain through evasion of income tax obligation - no prior criminality - all offenders of good character - excellent prospects of rehabilitation - parity - Lesley Mascall in a more serious category than co-conspirator (Mr McLean) - offending extended over longer period - significant delay in prosecution owing to extensive preparation - offenders aged between 56 and 71 - response to charges - active co-operation with authorities - retained accountant to rectify tax affairs - repaid debt - offered to assist authorities in prosecution of the accountant - pleas of guilty - 20 per cent discount - contrition - corrected an Australian Tax Office error resulting in additional reparation - remorse - all offenders offered a sincere apology - other offences in accordance with s 16BA Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) taken into account. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16A, s 16BA, s 29D and s 86(1) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 134.2(1) and s 135.4(3) Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) (No 1 of 2002) [2002] NSWCCA 518; (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Regina v Boughen and Cameron [2012] NSWCCA 17 Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525; [1990] HCA 18 Deakin v The Queen (1984) 58 ALJR 367; [1984] HCA 31 Regina v Dennison [2011] NSWCCA 114 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Regina v Morris (1992) 61 A Crim R 233 Regina v Nguyen and Phan (1996) 86 A Crim R 521 Powell v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623; [1974] HCA 26 Putlan v The Queen (2004) HCA 8; 218 CLR 174 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Paul Mascall (Offender) Lesley Mascall (Offender) Paul Sewell (Offender) Representation: Counsel: A J Payne SC (Offenders) P M Wass (Offenders) D Lee (Crown) File Number(s): DC 2008/46247; 2008/254397; 2008/137007; 2008/246234; 2008/137010; 2008/137012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate