NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gallard-Grant v Waverley Council [2012] NSWLEC 1247 Hearing dates: 22 August 2012 Decision date: 31 August 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: Alteration and additions to residential flat building, bulk, scale, impact on views, whether aesthetic upgrade of a building warrants departure from planning controls. Legislation Cited: Waverley Local Environmental Plan 1996 Cases Cited: Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167 Texts Cited: Draft Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2011; Waverley Development Control Plan 2010 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gale Gallard-Grant (Applicant) Waverley Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel Mr S Nash (Respondent) Solicitors Ms M Taylor, Bartier Perry (Applicant) Ms C Morton, Sparke Helmore(Respondent) File Number(s): 10300 of 2012
Judgment 1Ms Gallard-Grant owns a unit, known as Unit 1, at No. 52 Fletcher Street, Bondi. Unit 1 is the upper level unit and occupies the entire top floor of the building. Her architect lodged Development Application DA-108/2011 with Waverley Council on 14 March 2012 seeking consent to carry out alterations and additions to the strata titled residential flat building. The council refused consent and Ms Gallard-Grant is appealing that decision.
Background and the proposal 2Consent was sought for the following works: * Removal of the existing pitched roof and replacement with a new level, making the building in the location of the works a 4 level building. The new level would contain 2 bedrooms, bathroom, ensuite, open terrace and internal stairway extension that would form part of unit 1. * Extension of the lower level of unit 1 in a northerly direction to increase the living area of that unit. The extension occupies an areas currently used as a covered terrace. * Provision of a pergola to the north of the extended living area to unit 1. * Refurbishment of the remaining open deck with paving and replacement of the existing brick balustrade with glass balustrading. * Installation of new, larger windows to unit 1. * Provision of lift access from the garage level to units 1, 2 and 4 and to the street entry level. * Provision of a pergola and timber screen from the front entry stairs along the western side of the building to the southern entry foyer. * Enlargement/realignment and enclosure of the front balconies with louvred screens. * Enclosure of the west facing balconies to units 2 and unit 1 (existing level). * Provision of an additional terrace of the existing and proposed extended living area on the eastern side of unit 1. * Internal refurbishment of existing unit 1. * Alterations to the garage area of unit 1 to accommodate the proposed lift and general access from the stairwell. * Painting the building.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate