NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chau Ting Yung v Chau Ming Yung [2012] NSWSC 1033 Hearing dates: 17 August 2012 Decision date: 17 August 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Lindsay J Decision: Motion dismissed. The proceedings be referred for mediation before a mediator appointed by the Court. The proceedings be listed for directions before the Registrar. Costs of the motion be costs in the cause. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Security for Costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Commercial Causes Act 1903 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bhagat v Murphy [2000] NSWSC 892 General Steel Industries v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 115 Rajski v Computer Manufacturer and Design Pty Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 443 at 447E, 448C-D, 448G-449A and 451F Morris v Hanley [2001] NSWCA 374 Morris v Hanley [2000] NSWSC 957 Philips Electronics Australia Pty Ltd v Matthews (2002) 54 NSWLR 598 at 610 [52], Stanley-Hill v Kool [1982] 1NSWLR 460. Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Chau Ting Yung (Plaintiff) Chau Ming Yung (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Chau Ting Yung (self represented - Plaintiff) T Pickering (Defendant) Solicitors: Chau Ting Yung (self represented - Plaintiff) Garry Pickering (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011 / 287151
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate