NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Provida Pty Limited v Sharpe [2012] NSWSC 1041 Hearing dates: 27 and 28 August 2012 Decision date: 29 August 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraphs [31] - [32] Catchwords: CONTRACT - employment - restraint of trade - "directly or indirectly" - providing services through newly established company - company is "one-man band" with short history - overall context and evident purpose and object of "trade in competition" - phrase "indirectly" covers circumstances of defendant's close connection with new company CONTRACT - employment - restraint of trade - legitimate interest - protection of confidential information - severance of connection between defendant and clients of plaintiff CONFLICT OF LAWS - proper law of contract - closest and most real connection - place of formation of contract only one factor determining applicable system of law - location of head office of employer influential STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) - cartel provisions and restraints of trade - s 51(2)(b) exception - evident purpose to protect restraints on trade in employment contracts Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Restraints of Trade Act 1976 Cases Cited: Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland Inc v Witter (1952) 105 NE (2d) 685 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon [1991] NSWCA 19; (1991) 22 NSWLR 1 Bonython v Commonwealth [1951] AC 201 Buckley v Tutty [1971] HCA 71; (1971) 125 CLR 353 Cactus Imaging Pty Ltd v Peters [2006] NSWSC 717; (2006) 71 NSWLR 9 Cooney v Council of the Municipality of Ku-ring-gai [1963] HCA 47; (1963) 114 CLR 582 Curro v Beyond Productions Pty Ltd (1993) 30 NSWLR 337 Dewes v Fitch [1920] 2 Ch 159 Harlow Property Consultants Pty Ltd v Byford [2005] NSWSC 658 Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688 Kearney v Crepaldi [2006] NSWSC 23 Koops Martin Financial Services Pty Ltd v Reeves [2006] NSWSC 449 Lindner v Murdock's Garage [1950] HCA 48; (1950) 83 CLR 628 Linwar Securities Pty Ltd v Christopher Savage [2006] NSWSC 786 Littlewoods Organisation Ltd v Harris [1977] 1 WLR 1472 Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd [1894] AC 535 Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Co Inc v Fay [1988] HCA 32; (1988) 165 CLR 197 Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v Warburton (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 386 Toll (PGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 49; (2004) 219 CLR 165 Woolworths Ltd v Olson [2004] NSWCA 372 Wright v Gasweld Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 317 Category: Separate question Parties: Provida Pty Limited - plaintiff Ashley Sharpe - first defendant ITW Australis Pty Limited - second defendant CFCL Australia Pty Limited - third defendant Magni Pty Limited - fourth defendant Representation: Counsel: F Corsaro SC - for the plaintiff R W Tregenza - for the first defendant Solicitors: Proctor Phair Lawyers - for the plaintiff BTF Lawyers - for the first defendant Clayton Utz - for the second defendant Allens - for the third defendant Muir Lawyers - for the fourth defendant File Number(s): 2012/142996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate