NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kenoss Pty Ltd v Palerang Council (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 208 Hearing dates: 4 September 2012 Decision date: 07 September 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Biscoe J Decision: Separate question answered (a) Yes, and (b) No. Catchwords: SEPARATE QUESTION - On the proper construction of cl 21(b) of the Yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 2002, in considering the condition precedent therein to the grant of consent for subdivision of land in Zone No 2(v) where the subdivision takes in floodplain land: (a) is the only question whether the consent authority is satisfied that the subdivision takes in floodplain land? or (b) is there a further question whether the consent authority is satisfied that that floodplain land is an unsuitable area? Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4 Yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 2002 cll 9, 10, 16, 21, 39, 40, Part 3 Divs 1 and 2, Part 4 Div 1 Cases Cited: Leon Fink Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Film Commission [1979] HCA 26, 141 CLR 672 Preston v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2011] NSWCA 40 Texts Cited: The Australian Oxford Dictionary (1999) Oxford University Press Category: Separate question Parties: Kenoss Pty Limited (Applicant) Palerang Council (Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: Ms S Duggan SC (Applicant) Mr I Hemmings (Respondent) SOLICITORS: Gadens Lawyers (Applicant) Bradley Allen Love (Respondent) File Number(s): 10586/12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate