NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barel v Segal (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1054 Hearing dates: 3 and 4 September 2012 Decision date: 21 September 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Expedition List Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraph [57] Catchwords: CONVEYANCING - Conveyancing Act 1919, Section 66G(4) - "more beneficial" - not solely referable to comparative economic benefit CONVEYANCING - Conveyancing Act 1919, Section 66G(4) - exercise of discretion - planning issues capable of being resolved under process set out in Section 66G(5) do not prevent order under Section 66G(4) CONVEYANCING - Conveyancing Act 1919, Section 66F(3) - "equality money" - meaning and purpose - no application to facts CONVEYANCING - co-owners of property - "occupation fee" - meaning and purpose - only available where one co-owner is in sole occupation CONVEYANCING - Conveyancing Act 1919, Section 66G(3) - at least two individual trustees required for statutory trust for partition PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - adoption of referee's report - approach to be determined according to nature and circumstances of the case - appropriate to correct clear mistakes - whether evidence before referee supported finding made COSTS - Civil Procedure Act, 2005, Section 98(4) - appropriate case for making gross and fixed sum costs order - factors relevant Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Conveyancing Act 1919 Interpretation Act 1987 Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 Cases Cited: Barel v Segal (No 1) [2011] NSWSC 1181 Bellevard Constructions Pty Ltd v Energy Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 228 Built Environs Pty Ltd v Saunders International Ltd [2012] SASC 111 Chatterton v Chatterton (1989) 52 SASR 337 Chocolate Factory Apartments Limited v Westpoint Finance Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 784 Cordon Investments v Lesdor Properties Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 184 Croghan v Grosvenor (1991) 57 SASR 454 Dunston v Dunston (unreported, New South Wales Supreme Court, Cohen M, 14 September 1983) Forgeard v Shanahan (1994) 35 NSWLR 206 Ireland v Retallack (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1096 Luke v Luke (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 310 Ryan v Dries [2002] NSWCA 3 McCormick v McCormick [1921] NZLR 384 McMahon v Public Curator (Qld) [1952] St R Qd 197 Shannon v North East Wiradjuri Co Ltd (No 3) [2012] FAC 106 T S Swaminatha v Official Receiver [1957] 44 AIR (SC) 577 Wenco Industrial Pty Ltd v WW Industries [2009] VSCA 191 Texts Cited: Story, Equity Jurisprudence (14th ed, 1918) Butt, Land Law (6th ed, 2010) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Elie Barel - plaintiff Phillip Segal - defendant Representation: Counsel: J Van Aalst - for the plaintiff G Waugh - for the defendant Solicitors: Coopers Lawyers - for the plaintiff Low Doherty & Stratford - for the defendant File Number(s): 2010/412807
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate