NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Kala Capital Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2012] NSWSC 1073 Hearing dates: 24 July and 16 August 2012 Decision date: 16 August 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Further Amended Interlocutory Process dismissed. Applicant pay Second Respondent's costs on indemnity basis as agreed or as assessed. Second Respondent's costs be liquidator's costs of the winding up. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Winding up - Examinations by liquidator - Application to set aside examination summonses and orders for production - Application for removal of liquidator - Whether liquidator should be removed. Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 98 - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 461(1)(a), 473, 530A, 596A, 596B - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 42.2, 42.5 Cases Cited: - Apple Computer Australia Pty Ltd v Wily [2003] NSWSC 719; (2003) 46 ACSR 729; - Bovis Lend Lease Pty Ltd v Wily [2003] NSWSC 467; (2003) 45 ACSR 612 - Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225; 118 ALR 248 - Evans v Wainter Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 114; (2005) 145 FCR 176 - Hamod v State of New South Wales [2002] FCAFC 97; (2002) 188 ALR 659 - Lahoud v Lahoud [2006] NSWSC 126 - Liverpool City Council v Estephan [2009] NSWCA 161 - Ng v Chong [2010] NSWSC 127 - Re Allebart Pty Ltd (in liq) and the Companies Act [1971] 1 NSWLR 24 - Re Biposo Pty Ltd; Condon v Rodgers (No 3) (1995) 17 ACSR 730 - Re Club Superstores Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (1993) 10 ACSR 730 - Re Clutha Ltd [2000] NSWSC 647; (2000) 34 ACSR 685 - Re Mendarma Pty Ltd (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 1306 - Smarter Way (Aust) Pty Ltd v D'Aloia [2000] VSC 408; (2000) 35 ACSR 595 - Re Southern Equities Corporation Ltd (in liq); Bond v England (1997) 25 ACSR 394 - White Constructions (ACT) Pty Ltd (in liq) v GB White [2004] NSWSC 303 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Alfred Kin Chau Lee (Applicant) Kala Capital Pty Limited and Schon Condon (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: A. Ogborne (Applicant) J.T. Johnson (Respondents) Solicitors: Paul Bard Lawyers (Applicant) Carroll & O'Dea (Respondents) File Number(s): 11/338044
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate