NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ziliotto v Dr Hakim (No. 2) [2012] NSWSC 1079 Hearing dates: 3 September 2012 Decision date: 19 September 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: I vary the costs order made on 24 July 2012 and order as follows: The Defendant is to pay the Plaintiff's costs on an ordinary basis up to and including 7 April 2011 and thereafter the Plaintiff is to pay the Defendant's costs on an indemnity basis. Catchwords: COSTS - Offer of Compromise - Offer provides for payment of a specified amount "plus costs as agreed or assessed" - whether the Offer complies with r 20.26 UCPR - conflicting decisions of Court of Appeal - whether Offer conflicts with costs rule - Offer complies with r 20.26 - adjournment - Defendant entitled to costs thrown away by reason of the adjournment - scope of "costs thrown away". Legislation Cited: Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 (Vic) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Ambulance Service of NSW v Worley (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 236; (2006) 67 NSWLR Associated Confectionery (Aust) Ltd v Mineral and Chemical Traders Pty Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 349 Balta v Sew 'N' Save Pty Ltd (No 1) (1980) 28 SASR 385 Caine v Lumley General Insurance Ltd (No. 2) [2008] NSWCA 109 Dean v Stockland Property Management Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2010] NSWCA 141 Edelman v Badower [2010] VSC 427 Erect Safe Scaffolding (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sutton & Anor (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 289 In the matter of Cheal Industries Pty Ltd - Fitzpatrick v Cheal [2012] NSWSC 932 Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 85, Macquarie Radio Network Pty Ltd v Arthur Dent (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 339 Maitland Hospital v Fisher (No.2) [1992] 27 NSWLR 721 Old v McInnes and Hodgkinson [2011] NSWCA 410 Pritchard v Trius Constructions Pty Limited [No 2] [2011] NSWSC 1114 Rail Corporation NSW v Vero Insurance Ltd (No.2) [2012] NSWSC 926 San v Rumble (No 2) 2007] NSWCA 259; 48 MVR 492, South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service v King [2006] NSWCA 2 The Nominal Defendant v Hawkins [2011] NSWCA 93; (2011) 58 MVR 362 The Uniting Church v Takacs (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 172 Trustee for the Salvation Army (NSW) Property Trust v Becker (No. 2) [2007] NSWCA 194 Vieira v O'Shea (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 121 Texts Cited: Dal Pont GE, Law of Costs, 2nd Ed (2009) LexisNexis Butterworths, Australia Category: Costs Parties: Stella Maris Ziliotto (Plaintiff) Dr Claude Hakim (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Gross QC & BCA Bradley (Plaintiff) M Windsor SC & F Lalic (Defendant) Solicitors: P K Simpson & Co (Plaintiff) Avant Law Pty Ltd (Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/297666
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate