NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: LGS v Francesco Barbagallo (No.3) [2012] NSWSC 1099 Hearing dates: 20/08/2012, 21/08/2012, 22/08/2012, 23/08/2012 and 24/08/2012 Decision date: 18 September 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Judgment for defendants with costs. Catchwords: [INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY] - confidential information - obligation of confidentiality - whether plaintiffs have identified with adequate specificity, information claimed by it, to be confidential - whether defendant has misused confidential information in breach of employment obligations.
[EQUITY] - fiduciary duty - whether fiduciary duty owed - whether breach of equitable duty of confidence - whether valid assignment of information proposal - whether defendants have accessory liability to either or both of the plaintiffs.
[EVIDENCE] - approach to assessment of evidence - the jury basis - whether sufficiency of evidence is to be assessed on the jury basis. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (2005) Cases Cited: Amway Corporation v Eurway International Ltd [1974] RPC 82 Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland Inc v Witter 105 NE 2d 685 Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Corrs Pavey Whiting and Byrne v Collector of Customers (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434 Hughes v National Trustees, Executors and Agency Company of Australasia Limited (1979) 143 CLR 134 Hunt v Watkins (2000) 49 NSWLR 508 Interfirm Comparison (Australia) Pty Ltd v Law Society of New South Wales [1975] 2 NSWLR 104 Mailman v Ellison [1993] NSWCA 169 Naxakis v West General Hospital (1999) 197 CLR 269 Optus Networks Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2010) 265 ALR 281 O'Brien v Komesaroff (1982) 150 CLR 310 RosenKranz v Dessaix (2003) NSWSC 1085 Saltman Engineering Co Ltd v Campbell Egineering Co Ltd (1948) 65 RPC 203 Texts Cited: J. D. Heydon, Restraint of Trade Doctrine, 3rd Ed (2008) Butterworths Category: Principal judgment Parties: LGS (New South Wales) Pty Ltd (Formerly in Vivo Communications Pty Ltd) (Subject to deed of company arrangement) ACN 076 683 013 & LGS (Vic) Pty Ltd ACN 079 799 787(Plaintiff) Francesco Barbagallo (First Defendant) Chiron Communications Pty Ltd (ACN 068 226 166) (Second Defendant) Adrenalin Strategics Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: F G Lever SC / R M Higgins (Plaintiff) I M Jackman SC / M R Tyson (Defendants) Solicitors: Gillis Delaney Lawyers (Plaintiff) HWL Ebsworth (Defendants) File Number(s): 2006/293462
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate