NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hancock v R [2012] NSWCCA 200 Hearing dates: 7 August 2012 Decision date: 14 September 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] RA Hulme J at [2] Schmidt J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal be granted but the appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - appeal against sentence - whether he sentencing process was miscarried - Federal offences and State offences - whether sentences imposed were unusually harsh and severe - whether sentencing judge erred in commencing his sentencing exercise at an excessive level - whether sentencing judge erred in failing to make sufficient allowance for assistance - whether sentencing judge erred in failing to maintain parity - whether sentencing judge erred in failing to take delay into account - whether sentencing judge erred in failing to observe the principle of totality - whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to find special circumstances with respect to the whole sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Danial v R [2008] NSWCCA 15 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Green v R [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Johnson v R [2004] HCA 15; (2004) 205 ALR 346 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26; 131 CLR 623 R v Ma [2004] NSWCCA 92; (2004) 145 A Crim R 434 R v MAK; R v MSK (2006) [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006)167 A Crim R 159 R v Suares-Mejia [2002] WASCA 187; (2002) 131 A Crim R 577 R v Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92; (2006) 172 A Crim R 151 R v TAE [2005] NSWCCA 29 R v Welden [2002] NSWCCA 475; (2002) 136 A Crim R 55 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tony (aka Phillip) Hancock (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr MC Ramage QC (Applicant) Mr CP O'Donnell (Respondent) Solicitors: LN Legal (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/46635 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-09-01 00:00:00 Before: Solomon DCJ File Number(s): 2009/46635
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate