NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AM v R [2012] NSWCCA 203 Hearing dates: 12 September 2012 Decision date: 20 September 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J at [2] Garling J at [94] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - sentence - causing grievous bodily harm with intent to cause grievous bodily harm - plea of guilty - juvenile offender - unprovoked attack upon innocent stranger - victim punched repeatedly to the face - prone victim then kicked and stomped on the head - victim sustains traumatic brain injury - permanent cognitive impairment - applicant had no prior criminal history - troubled and dysfunctional background - head sentence of seven years with three year non-parole period - whether head sentence manifestly excessive - objective gravity of offence - relevance of youth, rehabilitation, specific and general deterrence - head sentence not manifestly excessive - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2008 Cases Cited: BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; 201 A Crim R 379 KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51; 182 A Crim R 571 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 Fajloun v R [2011] NSWCCA 41 R v Zhang [2004] NSWCCA 358 R v Mitchell [2007] NSWCCA 296; 177 A Crim R 94 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 R v Zoef [2005] NSWCCA 268 R v Williams [2004] NSWCCA 246; 148 A Crim R 325 Heron v R [2006] NSWCCA 215 R v Overall (1993) 71 A Crim R 170 Haoui v R [2008] NSWCCA 209; 188 A Crim R 331 R v Kirkland [2005] NSWCCA 130 R v Bobak [2005] NSWCCA 320 Testalamuta v R [2007] NSWCCA 258 R v Westerman [2004] NSWCCA 161 Matzick v R [2007] NSWCCA 92 R v Woods (NSWCCA, 9 October 1990, unreported) Ashe v R [2010] VSCA 119 R v Ross [2007] VSCA 213; 17 VR 80 R v Wright [1998] VSCA 84 Director of Public Prosecutions v Lawrence [2004] VSCA 154; 10 VR 125 Taskiran v R [2011] VSCA 358 AI v R [2011] NSWCCA 95 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 R v Sellars [2010] NSWCCA 133 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AM (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms HLA Cox (Applicant) Ms TL Smith (Respondent) Solicitors: Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Limited (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/226909 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-09-09 00:00:00 Before: Keleman DCJ File Number(s): 2010/226909 2010/120960
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate