NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Director General, Department Of Services, Technology & Administration v Veall (No. 6) [2012] NSWSC 1118 Hearing dates: 28 June 2012 Decision date: 13 November 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: The Plaintiff should bring in Short Minutes of Order to reflect the findings made in these reasons for judgment. Catchwords: TRADE AND COMMERCE - Trade Practices Act and associated legislation - consumer protection - misleading and deceptive conduct - unconscionable conduct - introduction agency - remedies - injunctions and declarations - compensatory orders - where defendants bankrupt - whether provable in the bankruptcies Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Akron Securities Ltd v Iliffe (1997) 41 NSWLR 353 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kritharas; Re Kritharas [2000] FCA 1442; (2000) 178 ALR 363 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Powerballwin.com.au Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 378 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Star Promotions Club Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 139 Commissioner for Fair Trading v TLC Consulting Services Pty Ltd [2011] QSC 233 Commissioner for Fair Trading v TLC Consulting Services Pty Ltd [2011] QSC 374 Director General, Department of Services, Technology and Administration v Veall [No 1] [2011] NSWSC 209 Director General, Department of Services, Technology and Administration v Veall & Ors (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 358 Director General, Department of Services, Technology and Administration v Veall (No 4) [2011] NSWSC 904 Director-General of the Department of Fair Trading v Monaghan [2003] NSWSC 1099 Holloway v Withan (1990) 21 NSWLR 70 Holt v Biroka Pty Ltd (1988) 13 NSWLR 629 I & L Securities and HTW Valuers [2002] HCA 41; (2002) 210 CLR 109 Re Lenske; Ex parte Lenske (1986) 9 FCR 532 Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (No. 2) (1993) 41 FCR 89 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Director General, Department of Services, Technology & Administration (Plaintiff) Hollie Veall (First Defendant) Helen Dimitrijevski (Second Defendant) Zivko Dimitrijevski (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Sarginson (Plaintiff) R Daoud (Solicitor) (First Defendant) No Appearances (Second & Third Defendants) Solicitors: Fair Trading Legal Services (Plaintiff) TW Legal (First Defendant) No Appearances (Second & Third Defendants) File Number(s): 2009/325996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate