NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AZURE 10-16 MARQUET STREET RHODES PTY LTD v LAU [2012] NSWCA 299 Hearing dates: 14 September 2012 Decision date: 14 September 2012 Before: Barrett JA Decision: The application for an extension of time made by the notice of motion of 20 July 2012 and now pursued alone by Mr Bhanji is dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - extension of time for filing of application for leave to appeal - no matter of principle Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Altaf Bhanji - Applicant Yan Fai Lau - First Respondent Suet Wang Cheung - Second Respondent Lawrence Nguyen - Third Respondent Joseph Sue - Fourth Respondent Chi Thuy Vu - Fifth Respondent Representation: S El-Hanania - Applicant P Mitchell - Respondents Saba El-Hanania Lawyer - Applicant Peter Mitchell Law Practice - Respondents File Number(s): 2012/97455 Decision under appeal Citation: No citation Date of Decision: 2011-06-30 00:00:00 Before: Pembroke J File Number(s): 2007/254102
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate