NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ROSS, James John v R [2012] NSWCCA 207 Hearing dates: 29 May 2012 Decision date: 26 September 2012 Before: Allsop P at [1] Hidden J at [69] Davies J at [70] Decision: 1.Extend time for the filing of a notice of appeal to the date of the filing of the notice of appeal herein. 2.Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - appellant convicted on 24 counts of sexual offences - appellant charged jointly or severally with complainant's mother - appellant and complainant's mother tried together - clear directions given by trial judge about use of evidence - no miscarriage of justice in joint trial
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - evidence - admission of record of interview - trial judge declined to exclude parts of interview to which appellant answered "no comment" - trial judge declined to exclude evidence of medical examination - evidence not prejudicial or irrelevant - clear directions given by trial judge - no miscarriage of justice
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - inconsistent verdicts - appellant acquitted on two counts at trial - evidence on all counts primarily that of complainant - acquittal on two counts not necessarily indicative of doubts about complainant's overall veracity - jury properly instructed - sound possible evidential bases for acquittal on two counts and conviction on 24 other counts - verdicts not inconsistent Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: DD v R [2010] NSWCCA 237 Demirok v R [1977] HCA 21; 137 CLR 20 Dungay v R [2010] NSWCCA 82 Gilbert v R [2000] HCA 15; 201 CLR 414 Jones v R [1997] HCA 56; 191 CLR 439 MFA v R [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 R v Baartman (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, 6 October 1994, unreported) R v Dellapatrona (1993) 31 NSWLR 123 R v Demirok [1976] VR 244 R v Fernando [1999] NSWCCA 66 R v Harbach (1973) 6 SASR 427 R v Middis (Supreme Court of NSW, 27 March 1991, unreported) R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 R v Plevac (1995) 84 A Crim R 570 R v Reeves (1992) 29 NSWLR 109 R v Skaf [2004] NSWCCA 74 TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151; 74 NSWLR 299 Webb and Hay v R [1994] HCA 30; 181 CLR 41 Category: Principal judgment Parties: James John Ross (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: G Corr (Appellant) J Girdham (Respondent) O'Briens Solicitors (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2008/5243 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-06-11 00:00:00 Before: Woods DCJ File Number(s): 2008/11/1024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate