NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Camilleri v Penrith City Council [2012] NSWADT 196 Hearing dates: 27 August 2012 Decision date: 21 September 2012 Jurisdiction: General Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Judicial Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: Neighbourhood dispute-complaints to council- access application-reasonable searches - overriding public interest against disclosure - substance of complaints known to applicant Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Cases Cited: Chapman v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2004] NSWADT 35 Curtin v Vice-Chancellor, University of New South Wales (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 56 DQ v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2002] NSWADT 215 Fahey v NSW Office of Liquor, Gaming & Racing [2012] NSW ADT 181 Hemeon v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2002] NSWADT 201 O'Hara v North Sydney Council [2005] NSWADT 100 Patsalis v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] NSWADT 213 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Clement Camilleri (Applicant) Penrith City Council (Respondent) Martin Bartolo (Joined party) Representation: C Camilleri (Applicant in person) M Bullivant (Respondent) M Bartolo (Joined party in person) File Number(s): 123049
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate