NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R. v. Michael Anthony Ryan (No. 7) [2012] NSWSC 1160 Hearing dates: 7/9/2012 Decision date: 18 September 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: S.G. Campbell J Decision: My ruling is that MFI 21 be admitted as Exhibit "P" Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - whether prior inconsistent statement admissible as exception to credibility rule - evidence admissible under exception in s 106 Evidence Act - CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - whether electronically recorded interview with police should go to the jury room during deliberations - rule in Gately v The Queen (2007) 232 CLR 208; R v NZ (2005) 63 NSWLR 628 - not applicable in this case - exhibit to be available to jury with direction against giving disproportionate weight to the evidence Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Evidence Act 1997 (Qld) Evidence Amendment Act 2007 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Adam v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 96 Aslett v R. [2006] NSWCCA 49 Blewitt v The Queen (1988) 62 ALJR 503 Gately v The Queen (2007) 232 CLR 208 Lee v the Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594 McMahon v. John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd (No. 5) [2012] NSWSC 218 R v Adam AKA Odishou (1999) 47 NSWLR 267 R v Davies (2005) 11 VR 314 R v Michael Anthony Ryan (No. 2) [2012] NSWSC 1034. R v NZ (2005) 63 NSWLR 628; Texts Cited: Odgers, Uniform Evidence Law, 10th Edition 2012. Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Regina (Crown) Michael Anthony Ryan (Defendant) Representation: Mr. P.K. Lynch (Crown Prosecutor) Mr. C.C. Waterstreet (Defendant) Director of Public Prosecutions Murphys Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/141863
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate