NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hull v Brailey [2012] NSWSC 1164 Decision date: 27 September 2012 Before: Grove AJ Decision: Direction that judgment be entered for the defendants. 1) The plaintiffs are to pay the defendants costs of the action as agreed or assessed; 2) The plaintiffs are to pay to the defendants interest on costs as assessed or agreed but not exceeding costs of $207,589.09 from 11 April 2012 until payment of that interest, and, the plaintiffs are to pay to the defendants interest on costs as assessed or agreed but not exceeding costs of $389,567.46 from 4 September 2012 until payment of that interest. Catchwords: COSTS Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333; [1975] 3 WLR 586 Joseph Lahoud & Anor v Victor Lahoud & Ors [2006] NSWSC 126 Category: Costs Parties: Richard Kenneth Hull (First plaintiff) Richard Kenneth Hull and Lainie Hull ATF the R&L Superannuation Fund (Second plaintiff) Lainie Hull (Third plaintiff) Edmund Francis Brailey (First defendant) TJC Financial Planning Pty Ltd (Second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr MS White of counsel with Mr PM Afshar of counsel (Plaintiffs) Mr TGR Parker SC with Mr CG Carroll of counsel (Defendants) Solicitors: McCabe Terrill Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Holman Webb Lawyers (Defendants) File Number(s): 2009/00297894
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate