NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 Hearing dates: 7 August 2012 Decision date: 04 October 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme J at [51] Schmidt J at [63] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Uphold the appeal and quash the sentence imposed in the District Court. 3. In relation to count 2 sentence the applicant to a non-parole period of 9 years commencing on 23 August 2008 and expiring on 22 August 2017 with an additional term of 3 years expiring on 22 August 2020. 4.In relation to count 1 and having regard to the matter on the Form 1 sentence the applicant to a non-parole period of 10 years and 6 months commencing on 23 August 2011 and expiring on 22 February 2022 with an additional term of 4 years and 6 months expiring on 22 August 2026. The aggregate non-parole period is accordingly 13 years and 6 months with an additional term of 4 years and 6 months. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - sentence - where sentencing judge failed to impose a non-parole period in respect of count 1 - whether sentencing judge erred in consideration of the standard non-parole period - where sentencing judge had regard to the standard non-parole period as one of the matters to be considered - whether sentencing judge breached the rule in Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610 - where sentencing judge first determined overall appropriate sentence before determining sentence for each count - Rule in Pearce v R breached - whether sentence is manifestly excessive - applicant resentenced - lesser sentence imposed. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Sentencing Act 1989 Cases Cited: Amacha v R; R v Amacha [2010] NSWCCA 180 KAF v R [2009] NSWCCA 184 KC v R [2009] NSWCCA 110 Leddin v R [2008] NSWCCA 242 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Attallah [2005] NSWCCA 277 R v Clark [2009] NSWCCA 49 R v Close (1992) 31 NSWLR 743 R v Donovan (Court of Criminal Appeal, 9 September 1992, unreported) R v Dunn [2004] NSWCCA 346 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Kama [2000] NSWCCA 23; (2000) 110 A Crim 47 R v Laalaa [2009] NSWCCA 250 R v Paxton [2011] NSWCCA 242 R v Radenkovic (Court of Criminal Appeal, 6 March 1990, unreported) R v Thomas (1992) 65 A Crim R 269 R v Wong [1999] NSWCCA 420; (1999) 48 NSWLR 340 Russell v R [2010] NSWCCA 248 SGJ v R; KU v R [2008] NSWCCA 258 Smaragdis v R [2010] NSWCCA 276 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maree Collier (Applicant) Crown Representation: Counsel: I McLachlan (Applicant) E Balodis (Crown) Solicitors: Michael Croke & Co (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/6354 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-04-15 00:00:00 Before: Black DCJ File Number(s): 2009/59403
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate