NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: "N" v "A" [2012] NSWCA 318 Hearing dates: 28 September 2012 Decision date: 28 September 2012 Before: Meagher JA (at [1] and [24], Barrett JA (at [2]) Decision: (1)Grant leave to appeal against orders (1)(iii) and (1)(iv) made by Ward J on 22 May 2012. (2)Otherwise dismiss the summons seeking leave to appeal. (3)Order that the costs of the summons for leave to appeal be costs in the appeal. Catchwords: LEAVE TO APPEAL - appeal against costs orders only - where Calderbank offers and other proposals and requests made - question of principle raised - serious question whether certain of the orders were plainly unreasonable and discretion miscarried - substantial costs sums at stake - as to other orders, error, if any, goes only to weight afforded to factors taken into account Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970, s 101(2)(c) Cases Cited: "A" v "N" [2012] NSWSC 354 "A" v "N" [2012] NSWSC 549 Gronow v Gronow [1979] HCA 63; (1979) 144 CLR 513 Maiden v Maiden [1909] HCA 16; (1909) 7 CLR 727 Category: Principal judgment Parties: "N" - Applicant "A" - First Respondent "E" - Second Respondent Representation: Mr S S Ahmed - Applicant Mr D M Roberts - First Respondent Mr C Zucker - Second Respondent Buttar, Caldwell & Co - Applicant Hunt & Hunt - First Respondent Zucker Legal - Second Respondent File Number(s): 2012/191519
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate