NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Goodridge (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1180 Hearing dates: 21 September 2012 Decision date: 03 October 2012 Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) I indicate that if the special hearing involving the Forensic Patient had been a normal trial against a person fit to be tried, I would have imposed a sentence of imprisonment; and (2) I nominate as the limiting term in respect of the Forensic Patient's offence, 18 years commencing on 16 May 2009. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - imposition of limiting term under Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act - sentencing factors relevant to the length of a limiting term - relevance of a forensic patient's mental condition to the length of a limiting term Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 Cases Cited: - Bhuiyan v R [2009] NSWCCA 221 - Courtney v R [2007] NSWCCA 195; 172 A Crim R 371 - R v AN [2005] NSWCCA 239 - R v Bell (1985) 2 NSWLR 466 - R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 - R v Goodridge [2012] NSWSC 378 - R v Mailes [2004] NSWCCA 394; 62 NSWLR 181 - R v Mitchell [1999] NSWCCA 120; 108 A Crim R 85 - R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina Michael William Goodridge Representation: Counsel: M Barr (Crown) P Winch (Forensic Patient) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Johnson & Sendall Solicitors (Forensic Patient) File Number(s): 2009/38556
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate