NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lucas Stuart Pty Limited v Hemmes Hermitage Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 1184 Hearing dates: 26 September 2012 Decision date: 28 September 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Grant plaintiff leave to file amended pleadings and to rely on Mr Ainsworth's affidavit Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - pleading - amendment - further evidence - likely costs - delay - explanation - hearing date not imminent Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: AON Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Cropper v Smith (1884) 26 Ch D 700 Dennis v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2008] NSWCA 37 State of Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 1; (1997) 189 CLR 146 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Lucas Stuart Pty Limited (ACN 067 550 403) (plaintiff, first cross-defendant) Hemmes Hermitage Pty Limited (ACN 001 259 409) (defendant, cross-claimant) Woods Bagot Pty Ltd (ACN 007 762 174) (second cross-defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Ashhurst SC with M Dolenec (plaintiff) T J Breakspear (defendant) Solicitors: BCP Lawyers & Consultants (plaintiff) King Wood & Mallesons (defendant) File Number(s): SC 2009/298813 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate