NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Owners Strata Plan 22724 v Owners Strata Plan 30403 [2012] NSWSC 1192 Hearing dates: 29 August 2012 Decision date: 05 October 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Lindsay J Decision: Summons dismissed. Catchwords: Estoppel - estoppel in pais - equitable estoppel - proprietary estoppel - whether an arrangement between parties was a permanent easement or a car park licence for an indefinite period determinable by either party on reasonable notice - whether defendant gave the plaintiff reasonable notice of its intention to terminate - proprietary estoppel not established Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Strata Titles Act 1973 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 35.2 Cases Cited: Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HL 129 at 170 Rudi's Enterprises Pty Limited v Jay (1987) 10 NSWLR 568 at 575F-576B Re Ellenborough Park [1956] 1 Ch 131 at 175, Hill v Tupper (1863) 159 ER 51 Crabb v Arun District Council and Hill v AWJ Moore & Co Pty Limited. Delaforce v Simpson-Cook (2010) 78 NSWLR 483 Evans v Evans [2011] NSWCA 92 DHJPM Pty Limited v Blackthorn Resources Limited [2011] NSWCA 348 Tadrous v Tadrous [2012] NSWCA 16 Walsh v Walsh [2012] NSWCA 57 Waddell v Waddell [2012] NSWCA 214 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Limited v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387; Silovi Pty Limited v Barbaro (1988) 13 NSWLR 466 at 472, Austotel Pty Limited v Franklins Selfservice Pty Limited (1989) 16 NSWLR 582 at 604 and 610; The Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 at 444-446; Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101. Plimmer v The Mayor, Councillors and Citizens of the City of Wellington (1884) LR 9 App Cas 699 at 713; Inwards v Baker [1965] 2 QB 29 at 36 and 38; Crabb v Arun District Council [1976] Ch 179 at 188-190; Waltons Stores (Interstate) Limited v Maher at 164 CLR 404 and 428-429; Hill v AWJ Moore & Co Pty Limited (Needham J, unrep, 31 August 1990) BC 9002063 at 12-13; Clancy v Salienta Pty Limited (2000) 11 BPR 20425 at [37] and [166]; Hoath v Connect Internet Services Pty Limited [2006] NSWSC 158, 69IPR 62 at [200]; McKeand v Thomas [2006] NSWSC 1028, 12 BPR [98201] at [114]-[130]. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Owners Strata Plan 22724 Owners Strata Plan 30403 Representation: MT McCulloch SC and S Fitzpatrick (Plaintiff) M Hall (Defendant) Jane Crittenden (Plaintiff) David Le Page (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012 / 193592
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate