NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cornish Investments Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2012] NSWADT 204 Hearing dates: 30 August 2012 Decision date: 05 October 2012 Jurisdiction: Revenue Division Before: A Verick, Judicial Member Decision: The assessments for the tax years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 under review are affirmed. Catchwords: Land tax - whether land exempt as land used for primary production - cattle breeding, cropping, riding and agistment of horses - whether the dominant use was "use for the maintenance of animals" - whether applicant failed the dominant use test - failure to discharge onus of proof Legislation Cited: Land Tax Management Act 1956 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Cases Cited: Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 83 ATC 4015 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dalco (1990) 168 CLR 614 Gauci v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1975] 135 CLR 81 Glenworth Valley Pastoral Company Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWADT 272 Hope v Bathurst City Council (No 2) (1983) 52 LGRA 79 Hope v Bathurst City Council (1986) 7 NSWLR 669 Jones v Commissioner of Land Tax 80 ATC 4539 Krew v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 71 ATC 4091 Leda Manorstead v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWSC 867 Palk v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2012] NSWADT 94 R v The War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal and another; ex parte Bott (1933) 50 CLR 228 Re Optimise Group Pty Ltd and Commissioner of Taxation [2010] AATA 782 Saville v Commissioner of Land Tax (1980) 12 ATR 7 Shanahan v Commissioner of Land Tax (1980) 80 ATC 4320 Thomson v Chief Executive, Department of Lands (1994-1995) 15 QLCR 286 Trautwein v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1936) 56 CLR 63 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cornish Investments Pty Limited as Trustee for Scenic Hills Property Unit Trust (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel I Hemmings (Applicants) AH Rider (Respondent) Marsdens Law Group (Applicants) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 106033, 116079
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate