NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Freitas v Bluescope Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1194 Hearing dates: 21/09/2012 Decision date: 21 September 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) The third defendant has leave to withdraw the admission contained in its defence; (2) The third defendant has leave to file and serve an amended defence on or before 4pm 28 September 2012. (3) I grant Transfield leave to file the reply to the defence to the fourth cross-claim on or before Friday 5 October 2012. (4) I order the third defendant to pay the second defendant's costs of the motion on an indemnity basis. (5) I order that the fourth cross-claimant serve all evidence upon which it proposes to rely in reply to the fourth cross-defendant's defence on or before 4pm 19 October 2012. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - leave to amend pleadings - futility or abuse of process - discretion Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: John Freitas (P) Bluescope Steel AIS Pty Ltd (D1) Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Ltd (D2) K&R Fabrications (W'Gong) Pty Ltd (D3) Representation: Counsel: Mr Cooley (P) B Wilson (D2) Mr Greenhalgh (D1) R Gambi (D3) Mr Stiles (Cross-Defendant) G Polczynski (Cross-Defendant) Solicitors: Bussoletti Lawyers (P) Bartier Perry (D1) DLA Piper Australia (D2) McCabes (D3) File Number(s): 2010/353117
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate