NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Paul v Cooke (Costs) [2012] NSWSC 1203 Hearing dates: 7 August 2012 Decision date: 07 August 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Brereton J Decision: Plaintiff to pay 95 per cent of the defendant's costs Catchwords: COSTS - apportionment of costs - where defendant succeeded on one issue but failed on others - whether costs should be apportioned - onus on plaintiff to demonstrate basis for departing from ordinary rule that successful defendant is entitled to costs - factors in deciding whether to deprive successful defendant of some or all of their costs - whether scope of liability can be separated from factual causation - where breach admitted by defendant - costs associated with breach of duty can be treated separately Legislation Cited: (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 20.26, r 42.15A (NSW) Civil Liability Act 2002, s 5D, s 5I Cases Cited: Paul v Cooke [2012] NSWSC 840 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (1986) ATPR 40 - 7489 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 Trade Practices Commission v Nickloss Enterprises Pty Limited (No 3) (1979) 28 ALR 201 Walkers v Henderson (Australia) NSWCA, 6 July 1994, unreported NRMA Limited v Morgan (No 3) (1999) NSWSC 768 Mobile Innovations Limited v Vodaphone Pacific Limited (2004) NSWCA 15 Waterman v Gerling Australia Insurance Company Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 1111 Chappell v Hart [I998] HCA 55 Regency Media v AAV Australia [2009] NSWCA 368 Category: Costs Parties: Christine Paul (Plaintiff) Kenneth Cooke (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D E Graham (Plaintiff) Ms V Thomas (Defendant) Solicitors: Maurice Blackburn Lawyers (Plaintiff) Blake Dawson (Defendant) File Number(s): 2008/ 289586
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate