NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jinnette v R [2012] NSWCCA 217 Hearing dates: 12 October 2012 Decision date: 16 November 2012 Before: Hoeben JA at [1] Johnson J at [2] Beech-Jones J at [119] Decision: Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - sentence - offences committed by sentenced prisoner following escape from correctional centre - offences of specially aggravated kidnapping, robbery, aggravated carjacking and escape lawful custody - sentences partially accumulated on existing sentences - whether error in application of totality principle - whether error in failing to find special circumstances - whether error in structure of sentences - applicant's dysfunctional upbringing and history of abuse - objective gravity of offences - relevance of institutionalisation - no error demonstrated by applicant - attention of sentencing judge not drawn to ss.56 and 57 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - failure to apply s.57(2)(b) - error favoured the applicant - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2008 Cases Cited: Ng v R [2011] NSWCCA 227; 214 A Crim R 191 Jackson v R [2010] NSWCCA 162 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 R v Speechley [2012] NSWCCA 130 R v Dickson [2002] NSWCCA 327; 132 A Crim 137 R v Horne [2004] NSWCCA 8 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 Baxter v R [2007] NSWCCA 237; 173 A Crim R 284 R v Pham [2005] NSWCCA 94 R v Williams [2004] NSWCCA 246; 148 A Crim R 325 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 at 47 Dyer v R [2011] NSWCCA 185 AM v R [2012] NSWCCA 203 Ta'ala v R [2008] NSWCCA 132 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; 167 A Crim R 159 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Paul Jinnette (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Barrow (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Respondent) Solicitors: David H Cohen & Co (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/45181 Publication restriction: --- Decision under appeal Citation: --- Date of Decision: 2010-09-10 00:00:00 Before: His Honour Judge Colefax SC File Number(s): 2009/45181
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate