NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Winter [2012] NSWCCA 218 Hearing dates: 12 September 2012 Decision date: 16 October 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J [57] Garling J at [58] Decision: 1. Uphold the appeal and quash the sentences imposed in the District Court. 2. In relation to count 1, sentence the respondent to a non-parole period of 4 years commencing on 17 November 2011 and concluding on 16 November 2015 with an additional term of 3 years expiring on 16 November 2018. 3. In relation to count 2, sentence the respondent to a non-parole period of 4 years commencing on 17 November 2013 and concluding on 16 November 2017 with an additional term of 3 years expiring on 16 November 2020. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal - sentence - whether sentence for manslaughter is manifestly inadequate - where respondent drove vehicle in circumstances where she was aware she may lose consciousness - where respondent had lost consciousness while driving on prior occasion - sentence manifestly inadequate - respondent re-sentenced - sentence increased. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; (2009) 195 A Crim R 1 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Everett v R (1994) 181 CLR 295 Gillett [2005] NSWDC 3 Gillett v R [2006] NSWCCA 370; 166 A Crim R 419 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Griffiths v R (1977) 137 CLR 293 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Forbes [2005] NSWCCA 377; (2005) 160 A Crim R 1 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42; (2002) 71 NSWLR 692 R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343; (2002) 55 NSWLR 252 Wong v R [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Woodbridge v R [2010] NSWCCA 185; (2010) 208 A Crim R 503 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown (Appellant) Karen Winter (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Smith (Crown/Appellant) C Smith (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Appellant) Legal Aid of NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/107456 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-02-29 00:00:00 Before: Toner DCJ File Number(s): 2011/107456
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate