NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Nykolyn [2012] NSWCCA 219 Hearing dates: 17 August 2012 Decision date: 17 August 2012 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Hall J at [50] R A Hulme J at [52] Decision: Reason delivered 16 October 2012: 1. Crown appeal dismissed. 2. Respondent's application for leave to appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal - sentence - where sentencing judge categorise each offence as being of similar seriousness - where sentencing judge failed to indicated impact of matters on Form 1 on sentence for particular offences - application of s 53A of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - whether sentencing judge erred in finding that offences were not planned - no error in finding that offences were not planned - whether sentencing judge erred in the manner in which he took into account mental illness of respondent - no error found in approach of sentencing judge to issue of mental illness - whether non-parole period of sentence manifestly inadequate - where non-parole period 21.42% of head sentence - where history of significant mental illness - where effective and appropriate psychiatric treatment requires - where respondent had history of not offending whilst on parole - non-parole period not manifestly inadequate. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Pawnbrokers and Second Hand Dealers Act 1996 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment Act 2010 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment Bill 2010 Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194, (2010) 79 NSWLR 1 FP v R [20120] NSWCCA 182 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown (Applicant) Daniel Joseph Nykolyn (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Dowling (Crown) J Stratton SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/69304 2011/11800 2011/201186 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-02-17 00:00:00 Before: Finnane DCJ File Number(s): 2011/69304 2011/11800
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate