NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tuncbilek v R [2012] NSWCCA 224 Hearing dates: 12/09/2012 Decision date: 24 October 2012 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J at [2] Garling J at [3] Decision: (1) Extend time for the filing of an application for leave to appeal to 23 March 2012. (2) Grant leave to appeal. (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - appellant convicted of armed robbery - whether Judge failed to give jury proper direction about circumstantial evidence and use of coincidence evidence - whether inappropriate for Crown not to lead evidence of biometric measurement of height - whether the conviction is unreasonable or cannot be supported, having regard to all the evidence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 Cases Cited: M v R [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 Morris v R [1987] HCA 50; (1987) 163 CLR 454 SKA v R [2011] HCA 13; (2011) 243 CLR 400 Wood v R [2012] NSWCCA 21 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tarkan Tuncbilek (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Self (Appellant) T Smith (Respondent) Self (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/208112 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-11-03 00:00:00 Before: Flannery DCJ File Number(s): 2009/208112
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate