NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Magiros v Sutherland Shire Council [2012] NSWLEC 1286 Hearing dates: 15 October 2012 Decision date: 16 October 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal upheld Catchwords: CONSENT ORDERS: Dwelling house, SEPP1 objection to development standards for height, landscape area and floor space ratio Legislation Cited: Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 - Georges River Catchment State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 Development Standards; Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2006; Cases Cited: Tenacity Consulting v Warringah Council [2004] NSWLEC 140 Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827; Winten Property Group v North Sydney Council [2001] NSWLEC 46; Texts Cited: Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan 2006 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Magiros (Applicant)
Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel Mr A Galasso SC (Applicant) Solicitors Ms M Mallos Maddocks Lawyers (Applicant)
Ms J Amy Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 10679 of 2012
Judgment 1Mr Magiros lodged Development Application No. 12/0151 with Sutherland Shire Council on 8 March 2012 seeking consent to demolish an existing dwelling house and garage and erect a new dwelling house and garage to be connected to an existing two storey ancillary 'recreation building' located at a lower level to the proposed new dwelling house. 2The council refused consent and Magiros is appealing that decision. 3The matter was mediated by another Commissioner of the Court and as a result of that process, the applicant has prepared amended plans that resolve the council's contentions. Leave has been granted to the applicant to rely on those amended plans. 4The parties are seeking consent orders from the Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate