NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: North Sydney Council v Perini [2012] NSWLEC 239 Hearing dates: 22/10/12 Decision date: 22 October 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Pepper J Decision: Leave to re-open to adduce fresh evidence granted. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to re-open to adduce further evidence - application made after judgment reserved but before judgment handed down - principles to apply - leave granted. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 76A(1)(b), 96, 125(1) Cases Cited: Belford and Bound v R [2011] QCA 43; (2011) 208 A Crim R 256 Burrell v The Queen [2008] HCA 34; (2008) 238 CLR 218 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] HCA 12; (2005) 223 CLR 1 Dyett v Jorgensen [1995] 2 Qd R 1 Kennedy v Stockland Developments Pty Ltd (No 6) [2012] NSWLEC 34 Mahmood v State of Western Australia [2008] HCA 1; (2008) 232 CLR 397 Mahmood v State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 101 Perini v North Sydney Council [2010] NSWLEC 1325 Wollondilly Shire Council v Foxman Environmental Development Services Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] NSWLEC 35 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: North Sydney Council (Prosecutor) Peter Perini (Defendant) Representation: Mr I Hemmings (Prosecutor) Mr C Gough (solicitor) (Defendant) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Prosecutor) Storey & Gough Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 50043 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate